Deep Sea Mining

DSM is not investible as a pure-profit business

Stress-tested across ten thousand simulations, the proponent’s numbers return a loss at the median — before environmental or social costs.

27%
Proponent
rate of return
4%
Stress-tested
return

The iron law of megaprojects

Less than 10% of all megaprojects come in on time and on budget — frontier projects like deep-sea mining are particularly risky. Here are some cost overruns.

Kashagan oilfield+450%
2004–16 · $10bn → $55bn
Boston “Big Dig”+421%
1991–2007 · $2.8bn → $14.6bn
California High-Speed Rail+282%
2008– · $33bn → $126bn
HS2 (UK)+205%
2012– · £33bn → £100bn
Channel Tunnel+80%
1988–94 · £2.6bn → £4.7bn
Deep-sea mining+76%
??? · median overrun modelled
Gorgon LNG+46%
2009–16 · $37bn → $54bn

How overruns play in the project

RevenuesCash FlowsPost TaxValue TodayProponentStress-tested$366bn$250bn$113bn$23bn$144bn$10bn–$5bn–$5bn
$366bn of revenue collapses to a negative value today — stage by stage, across 10,000 simulations.

Some major operational challenges

Deep-sea mining as an asset class

302010010203040Volatility / risk, %Expected return, %Real EstateRetailManufacturingNatural ResourcesServicesHospitalityHealthRisk–ReturnBalanceDSM ProponentDSM Stress-testedOptimism BiasFrontier investment requires 25%+ ↑

The commercial case doesn’t clear on its own terms.

No exploitation licence should be issued without compliance-grade financial disclosure and thin capitalisation provisions.

Koinon Consulting · June 2026 · Investment proposition 1 of 3